The Matter with Things — Summary (8/10)

Sud Alogu
15 min readDec 7, 2023

Table of Contents


In his compelling work “The Matter With Things,” Iain McGilchrist presents a revolutionary perspective on how our understanding and interaction with the world are deeply influenced by the intrinsic architecture of our brain. At the heart of this exploration is the brain’s division into two hemispheres, each possessing distinct but complementary modes of processing reality. McGilchrist’s thesis revolves around a critical imbalance in these modes — a modern societal skew towards the left hemisphere’s way of thinking. This hemisphere, characterized by its analytical, linear, and detail-oriented approach, excels in breaking down complex systems into simpler, more manageable parts. While this mode of thinking has undoubtedly fueled scientific and technological advancements, McGilchrist argues that it comes with a cost. The over-reliance on this left-hemispheric approach, he posits, leads to a fragmented and mechanistic view of the world, one that fails to appreciate the interconnectedness and inherent complexity of life.

In contrast, the right hemisphere offers a more holistic, empathetic, and context-aware perspective. It excels in synthesizing information, understanding relationships, and grasping the bigger picture. McGilchrist asserts that the modern world’s challenges and crises, from environmental degradation to societal disconnection, can be attributed to the neglect of this right-hemispheric viewpoint. Through his book, he aims to rebalance this skewed perception, advocating for a more integrated approach that values both the detailed focus of the left hemisphere and the broad, interconnected understanding of the right.

The Brain’s Duality

In “The Matter With Things,” Iain McGilchrist delves deeply into the duality of the human brain, elucidating how the two hemispheres, though interdependent, bring markedly different approaches to our cognition and perception of the world. His analysis goes beyond the simplistic notion of one hemisphere being dominant over the other, instead highlighting a more subtle and profound interplay that shapes our consciousness and understanding.

The left hemisphere, as McGilchrist outlines, is characterized by its analytical prowess. It excels in linear thinking, focusing on details and breaking complex phenomena into smaller, more digestible parts. This mode of cognition is sequential, preferring a step-by-step approach to problem-solving and understanding. The left hemisphere thrives on categorization, logic, and precision, lending itself effectively to tasks that require attention to detail, such as language processing, mathematical computations, and critical analysis. In essence, it’s the part of our brain that helps us navigate the world in a structured, orderly fashion, making sense of chaos by dissecting and compartmentalizing it.

In contrast, the right hemisphere offers a holistic view. It’s the part of the brain that’s adept at synthesizing disparate pieces of information, understanding context, and grasping the bigger picture. This hemisphere is characterized by its ability to process complex, abstract, and nuanced information. It’s where empathy, intuition, and creativity reside. The right hemisphere is essential in interpreting emotions, understanding metaphors, and appreciating art. It helps us to connect with others and the world around us in a more profound and meaningful way, enabling a sense of empathy and interconnectedness.

McGilchrist’s exploration reveals that both hemispheres are crucial and that their optimal functioning depends on a delicate balance and collaboration. The left hemisphere’s detail-oriented approach is invaluable for tasks that require precision and analytical reasoning. However, when overemphasized, it can lead to a fragmented, isolated view of the world, where the whole is lost in the sum of its parts. On the other hand, the right hemisphere’s broad, integrative approach is essential for understanding complexity and maintaining a sense of connectedness. An overreliance on this hemisphere, however, could result in an overly abstract and less grounded perspective.

This duality and balance of the brain’s hemispheres have significant implications for how we learn, interact, and develop as individuals and societies. In an era where left-hemispheric qualities are often overvalued — epitomized by a focus on data, metrics, and specialization — McGilchrist’s work serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of right-hemispheric qualities like empathy, context-awareness, and holistic thinking. Understanding and embracing this duality is key to addressing many of the challenges we face today, from personal well-being and education to societal and environmental issues. McGilchrist’s insights offer a roadmap for a more balanced, integrated approach to living and understanding, one that respects and utilizes the unique strengths of both hemispheres.

McGilchrist embarks on a historical exploration to understand the shifting dominance of the brain’s hemispheres over time. He traces a path from the Renaissance, through the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution, to the present day, showing how these epochs have increasingly favored the left hemisphere’s analytical, linear, and detail-oriented approach, shaping our worldviews and societal structures.

The Renaissance, often hailed as a golden age of human achievement, serves as a prime example of the harmonious operation of both brain hemispheres, as described by Iain McGilchrist in “The Matter With Things.” This era was characterized by a remarkable fusion of artistic creativity and scientific inquiry, where the holistic, empathetic view of the right hemisphere beautifully complemented the detailed, analytical approach of the left hemisphere. This synergy led to groundbreaking advancements in both art and science, showcasing a balanced cognitive approach that fostered a more profound understanding of the world.

Leonardo da Vinci: He is the quintessential Renaissance man, embodying the integration of art and science. Leonardo’s artistic endeavors were deeply intertwined with his scientific explorations. His studies in anatomy, for instance, informed his artwork, giving it an unparalleled realism and depth. Conversely, his artistic sensitivity enhanced his scientific observations, enabling him to perceive and depict the subtleties of human emotion and the complexities of the natural world.

Michelangelo Buonarroti: Another towering figure of the Renaissance, Michelangelo, was not just a master artist but also an accomplished architect and poet. His work on the Sistine Chapel ceiling is a testament to the fusion of artistic genius and a deep understanding of human anatomy, showcasing a blend of creativity (right hemisphere) and precision (left hemisphere).

Galileo Galilei: Often regarded as the father of modern science, Galileo’s contributions went beyond mere scientific discovery. His approach to science was deeply creative, employing imaginative thought experiments and artistic representations to conceptualize and communicate complex astronomical concepts.

Albrecht Dürer: A renowned artist of the Northern Renaissance, Dürer was also interested in mathematics and geometry. His famous works, such as “Melencolia I,” not only display artistic brilliance but also incorporate complex mathematical concepts, reflecting a balanced engagement of both hemispheres.

Filippo Brunelleschi: Known for his architectural marvels like the Dome of Florence Cathedral, Brunelleschi combined artistic vision with engineering prowess. His understanding of perspective in painting and his innovations in architectural techniques exemplify the Renaissance’s integrated cognitive approach.

These examples from the Renaissance demonstrate how the balanced engagement of both brain hemispheres led to a flourishing of creativity and innovation. This era’s remarkable achievements in art, science, and philosophy highlight the potential of a cognitive approach that harmonizes detailed analysis with holistic understanding, a principle that McGilchrist suggests is crucial for addressing the challenges of our contemporary world.

However, as history progressed into the Enlightenment, there was a noticeable shift. This era celebrated reason and scientific inquiry, gradually tilting the cognitive balance toward the left hemisphere. The world began to be perceived more mechanically, as something to be dissected, categorized, and understood through reductionist principles. While this led to significant scientific advancements, it also began to overshadow the holistic, integrative perspective of the right hemisphere.

The Industrial Revolution further amplified this shift. It was a time of unprecedented technological progress and industrial growth, where efficiency, standardization, and quantification were paramount. This period saw the world increasingly through the lens of the left hemisphere, viewing nature and human society as machines comprising separate, interacting parts. This mechanistic view was efficient for industrial and economic growth but led to a fragmented understanding of the world and our place within it.

In contemporary times, this left-hemisphere dominance has become even more pronounced. The rise of digital technology and the information age has reinforced a worldview that prioritizes data, analysis, and compartmentalization. Our education systems, workplace structures, and even social interactions have increasingly mirrored this left-hemispheric approach, emphasizing specialization and technical proficiency over holistic understanding and empathetic connection.

McGilchrist argues that this historical journey towards left-hemisphere dominance has profound implications. It has led to a reductionist view of the world, where the complexity and interconnectedness of life are often overlooked. In this context, societal challenges such as environmental degradation, social fragmentation, and even personal mental health issues can be seen as symptoms of a broader cognitive imbalance. By understanding this historical context, McGilchrist lays the groundwork for advocating a more balanced engagement of both hemispheres, suggesting that such a shift is essential for addressing the multifaceted challenges of our time.

Implications for Science and Philosophy

Iain McGilchrist’s argument in “The Matter With Things” is not just a commentary on neurology but a profound critique of contemporary scientific and philosophical approaches. He contends that the overemphasis on left-hemisphere thinking in these domains has ushered in a mechanistic view of the universe, sidelining the qualitative, interconnected aspects that are crucial for a holistic understanding of existence.

In science, the left hemisphere’s dominance has manifested in an increasing predilection for reductionism — the practice of breaking down complex systems into their individual components. While this approach has undoubtedly led to significant advancements, allowing us to understand the minutiae of the natural world, McGilchrist argues that it falls short in comprehending the complexity of larger systems. The reductionist method, though efficient in analyzing specific parts, often overlooks the dynamics of how these parts interact and the emergent properties that arise from these interactions. This leads to a fragmented understanding of the natural world, where the sum is never quite equal to its parts.

In the realm of philosophy, the impact of left-hemisphere dominance is seen in the way existential questions are approached. Philosophical inquiries have increasingly leaned towards a more analytical, logical framework, often at the expense of more existential, experiential, and holistic considerations. This shift has led to a form of philosophical discourse that, while rigorous in argumentation, sometimes misses the essence of human experience and the interconnectedness of our existence with the world around us.

McGilchrist points out that this left-hemisphere approach, with its focus on categorization, abstraction, and decontextualization, tends to view the world and our existence in it as a series of mechanical processes. It downplays or outright ignores the qualitative experiences, the subjective perceptions, and the intrinsic value of entities and their interrelations. This perspective, while useful in certain contexts, is inadequate for addressing the full spectrum of human experience and the complexities of the natural world.

What McGilchrist suggests, then, is a paradigm shift towards a more balanced integration of both hemispheres in scientific and philosophical pursuits. This integration would not only entail a detailed analysis of parts (left hemisphere) but also an appreciation of how these parts fit into and contribute to the whole (right hemisphere). Such an approach would recognize the value of qualitative experiences and the interconnectedness of systems, leading to a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the universe and our place within it.

In essence, McGilchrist’s argument calls for a reevaluation of our cognitive approaches in science and philosophy, advocating for a more inclusive, empathetic, and holistic perspective. This shift is crucial for grappling with the complex, multifaceted challenges of our time, from environmental crises to existential questions about human nature and purpose.

Part 2: Why McGilchrist’s Insights Matter Today

Education and Learning

The insights presented by Iain McGilchrist in “The Matter With Things” have profound implications for the field of education. His analysis suggests that the current educational paradigm, which often prioritizes left-hemisphere qualities such as analytical skills and linear thinking, might be overlooking critical aspects of learning and intellectual development. McGilchrist’s thesis advocates for a more balanced educational approach that equally nurtures both analytical skills and creative, holistic thinking.

At the heart of this argument is the recognition that education should not just be about imparting knowledge or developing specific skill sets. Instead, it should aim at fostering well-rounded individuals capable of critical thinking, creativity, and empathy. The left hemisphere’s strengths, such as logical reasoning, sequential processing, and detail-oriented thinking, are undoubtedly essential. They enable students to tackle complex problems methodically, understand the intricacies of language and mathematics, and develop technical skills. However, this should not come at the expense of the right hemisphere’s attributes, which include holistic understanding, pattern recognition, and emotional and social intelligence.

A balanced educational approach would mean integrating subjects and teaching methods that encourage right-hemisphere engagement. For instance, arts and humanities, often sidelined in a STEM-focused education system, play a crucial role in developing empathy, cultural awareness, and the ability to perceive the world from different perspectives. Likewise, teaching methods that emphasize inquiry-based learning, collaborative projects, and real-world problem-solving can engage the right hemisphere, fostering a sense of connection and relevance.

In an era increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence (AI), the significance of right-hemispheric skills, as discussed by Iain McGilchrist, becomes more pronounced in educational approaches. AI’s proficiency in tasks involving analysis, pattern recognition, and problem-solving, characteristic of the left hemisphere, necessitates a human focus on areas where AI is less adept, such as empathy, creativity, and holistic understanding. Education must thus evolve to emphasize the integration of arts and humanities alongside STEM subjects. These disciplines are crucial for cultivating empathy, cultural awareness, and a broad perspective on the human experience — skills that AI cannot replicate. Inquiry-based learning and collaborative projects should be key components of this approach, fostering a sense of connection, relevance, and the ability to work effectively in diverse teams. By focusing on these areas, education can prepare individuals for future roles that require managing social, ethical, and cultural dimensions in an AI-driven world, ensuring that human contributions remain distinct and valuable.

Furthermore, as AI transforms industries and societal structures, the ability to engage in real-world problem-solving becomes indispensable. Educational methods that connect theoretical learning to practical, real-life scenarios will be crucial in helping students understand the broader implications and ethical considerations of AI integration. This approach will encourage the application of knowledge to complex societal challenges, promoting creative and innovative thinking. Additionally, in a landscape where routine tasks are increasingly automated, the cultivation of emotional intelligence and empathy gains immense importance. Education should focus on building these human-centric skills, enabling students to effectively understand and navigate emotions, develop strong interpersonal relationships, and empathize with others. In summary, a balanced educational system that nurtures right-hemispheric skills alongside left-hemispheric ones is essential for equipping individuals to thrive in a future where AI plays a pivotal role, ensuring that human roles evolve to complement, rather than compete with, the capabilities of AI.

Moreover, McGilchrist’s thesis suggests that education should not just be about ‘what’ we learn but ‘how’ we learn. It implies moving away from rote memorization and standardized testing, which predominantly engage left-hemispheric functions, towards more experiential, contextual, and reflective learning experiences. These experiences help students see the interconnectedness of knowledge, understand the broader implications of what they learn, and develop a more profound and integrated understanding of the world.

Such a shift would also mean reevaluating the role of educators. Teachers would not only be transmitters of knowledge but facilitators of learning, guiding students to make connections between different areas of knowledge, encouraging critical and creative thinking, and nurturing emotional and social intelligence. This approach recognizes that true education is not just about preparing individuals for the workforce but about developing thoughtful, empathetic, and well-rounded citizens capable of contributing meaningfully to society.

In essence, the implications of McGilchrist’s thesis for education are a call to embrace a more holistic approach to learning. By valuing both the analytical prowess of the left hemisphere and the creative, empathetic capacities of the right, the educational system can foster a generation of individuals who are not only intellectually capable but also emotionally intelligent and socially responsible.

Mental Health and Society

In “The Matter With Things,” Iain McGilchrist’s exploration of the brain’s hemispheric functions sheds light on the mental health crisis and societal issues that plague our times. He argues that the predominance of left-hemisphere thinking in our society may be contributing to feelings of isolation, fragmentation, and a host of mental health challenges. By advocating for a more balanced cognitive approach that gives equal weight to the right hemisphere’s capacities, McGilchrist suggests a pathway towards improved mental well-being and social cohesion.

The left hemisphere, with its focus on detail, analysis, and abstraction, can lead to a way of perceiving the world that is compartmentalized and disconnected. While it excels in tasks that require precision and logic, its dominance can result in a worldview where relationships, emotions, and the broader context are undervalued. In a society where left-hemisphere qualities are overly emphasized, individuals may struggle with understanding their place in the larger tapestry of life, leading to feelings of alienation and meaninglessness. This mechanistic view of the world and human relationships can exacerbate mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and a sense of disconnection.

Conversely, the right hemisphere offers a more holistic, empathetic, and interconnected perspective. It is instrumental in understanding the broader context, recognizing emotional nuances, and fostering empathy. The right hemisphere’s approach to processing the world is integral to feeling a sense of belonging, understanding our relationships with others, and perceiving life’s experiences in a more integrated and meaningful way.

McGilchrist’s thesis implies that a balanced engagement of both hemispheres is crucial for mental health and societal well-being. In educational systems, workplaces, and social interactions, fostering right-hemisphere qualities such as empathy, creativity, and holistic thinking could mitigate the sense of isolation and fragmentation that arises from an overly analytical and compartmentalized view of the world.

In practical terms, this could mean incorporating mindfulness practices, arts, and community-oriented activities into daily life and education. It suggests a reevaluation of societal values, moving away from a sole focus on productivity and efficiency towards a greater appreciation of human connection, community, and emotional well-being. Policies and practices that encourage community engagement, environmental connectedness, and empathetic communication could play a pivotal role in addressing the mental health crisis.

Moreover, this balanced approach has implications for how mental health is understood and treated. Rather than solely focusing on symptom management, there could be a greater emphasis on holistic care that considers the individual’s emotional, social, and environmental contexts. This perspective aligns with emerging trends in psychology and psychiatry that recognize the importance of an integrated approach to mental health, one that considers the interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors.

Environmental Considerations

Iain McGilchrist’s insights into the brain’s hemispheric functions have significant implications for understanding and addressing environmental issues. In “The Matter With Things,” he emphasizes how a right-hemisphere perspective, which values interconnectedness, empathy, and a holistic view, is crucial for developing sustainable environmental practices and policies.

The right hemisphere of the brain is instrumental in helping us perceive the world not as a collection of separate, unrelated entities, but as an interconnected whole. It enables us to understand the complex interdependencies that define ecological systems. This holistic perspective is essential in recognizing that actions taken in one part of the ecosystem can have far-reaching effects on other parts, often in ways that are not immediately apparent. For example, the right hemisphere’s approach would allow us to see the connections between carbon emissions, climate change, and the broader impacts on biodiversity, weather patterns, and even human health and migration.

Moreover, the right hemisphere’s capacity for empathy is crucial in shaping our attitudes towards the environment. Empathy allows us to extend our concern beyond ourselves and our immediate surroundings to the larger world, including other species and ecosystems. This empathetic understanding is the foundation of a deep ecological consciousness, where the well-being of the planet is seen as intrinsically linked to our own well-being.

However, in a world where left-hemisphere thinking has been dominant, environmental policies and practices have often been driven by a reductionist perspective. This approach tends to focus on specific, quantifiable aspects of environmental problems, such as emission targets or deforestation rates, without fully considering the broader ecological and social contexts. While such measures are important, they can lead to fragmented solutions that fail to address the underlying systemic issues.

McGilchrist’s thesis suggests that a more balanced approach, integrating both hemispheres, could lead to more comprehensive and effective environmental policies. Such policies would not only address the immediate, tangible aspects of environmental challenges but also consider the deeper, interconnected factors that contribute to these issues. For instance, this could mean designing conservation strategies that not only protect individual species but also preserve the integrity of entire ecosystems, including the human communities that are part of them.

Additionally, an education and awareness approach informed by right-hemisphere qualities could foster a greater sense of stewardship and responsibility towards the environment. Encouraging practices that cultivate empathy for the natural world, such as outdoor education, community-based conservation efforts, and exposure to nature from a young age, could be pivotal in developing a more environmentally conscious and responsible society.

In “The Matter With Things,” Iain McGilchrist presents a compelling argument for the need to reevaluate and rebalance our cognitive approaches, highlighting the critical roles played by both hemispheres of the brain in shaping our perception, understanding, and interaction with the world. His insights are not just academically intriguing but hold profound relevance for addressing the myriad challenges facing contemporary society.

Throughout the book, McGilchrist underscores the importance of the right hemisphere’s holistic, empathetic, and interconnected perspective, which has often been overshadowed by the left hemisphere’s analytical, linear, and detail-oriented approach. The dominance of left-hemispheric thinking, while beneficial in certain contexts, has led to a fragmented view of the world, contributing to issues in education, mental health, societal structure, and environmental policy. McGilchrist’s work is a call to restore balance, advocating for a more integrated approach that values the strengths of both hemispheres.

This balanced approach is crucial in education, where fostering both analytical skills and creative, holistic thinking is essential for well-rounded intellectual development. In mental health and societal issues, integrating the right hemisphere’s capacity for empathy and interconnectedness can mitigate feelings of isolation and fragmentation, promoting well-being and social cohesion. In environmental policy, a right-hemispheric perspective emphasizes the interconnectedness of all life, leading to more sustainable practices and policies.

The relevance of McGilchrist’s thesis extends beyond specific domains to the very essence of how we live and interact with each other and our planet. Embracing both hemispheres of our brain allows us to navigate the complexities of the modern world with greater wisdom, empathy, and effectiveness. It enables us to see beyond the immediate and apparent, to understand the deeper connections and broader contexts that define our existence.